UK Broadband Deals   Local Loop Unbundling Brings More Competition Keyword Discovery
Get our FREE SEO Guide
Subscribe to our newsletter to receive useful SEO tips, tricks, strategies, free ebooks that are available only to our subscribers and get this amazing SEO guide for free!

Your email is safe and will NEVER be shared with any other parties. And of course, you can unsubscribe at any time.

Name:
Email:
SEO Elite - #1 SEO Software

Who Else Wants To Finally Get A #1 Google Ranking In As Little As 7 Days... And Drive A Minimum Of 789 Unique Visitors To Your Websites Per Day?

Search engine spider simulator PHP script

With this PHP script, you can take a look at any website with the eyes of a search engine spider

Only $9.95
Coming soon ...


Self SEO Store  
SEO forum
Website templates
Flash templates
Best hosting reviews.
Free Internet & IT Magazines.
Articles archive

Submit your article

Register
Login

Search
XML news feeds
Free RSS news reader
Contact


AddThis Feed Button

UK Broadband Deals Local Loop Unbundling Brings More Competition

Posted by Michael Sterios on: 2005-10-20 17:00:59

Self SEO > Internet Connection Articles


The local loop is currently owned by BT in the United Kingdom but as of 13 January 2005, 31,000 local loop connections have been unbundled. While this is short of the target of 50,000 Ofcom hopes that 1 million local loop connections will be unbundled by June 2006.


LLU is generally opposed by the Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (ILECs) such as BT, which in most cases used to be state monopoly enterprises before the telecommunications sector was liberalised. They argue that LLU amounts to a regulatory taking, that they are forced to provide competitors with essential business inputs, that LLU stifles infrastructure-based competition and technical innovation because new entrants prefer to 'parasitise' the incumbent's network instead of building their own and that the regulatory interference required to make LLU work (e.g. to set the price) is detrimental to the market.

New entrants, on the other hand, argue that, since they cannot economically duplicate the incumbent's local loop, they cannot actually provide certain services, such as ADSL, without LLU, thus allowing the incumbent to monopolise the respective market and stifle innovation. They point out that alternative access technologies, such as Wireless Local Loop (WLL) have proven uncompetitive and/or impractical, and that under current pricing models, the incumbent is guaranteed a fair price for the use of his facilities, including an appropriate return on investment. Finally, they argue that the ILECs generally did not construct their local loop in a competitive, risk-fraught environment, but under state monopoly protection and using taxpayer money, which means - according to the new entrants - that ILECs ought not to be entitled to continue to extract monopoly rents from the local loop.

Telecoms watchdog Ofcom has previously said that LLU is the most effective way of delivering more innovation, greater choice and lower prices in broadband.

Put simply, it allows operators the chance to offer higher speeds, lower prices and extras such as cheap net telephone calls, without having to wait for BT to offer them first.

Most developed nations, including the USA and the EU Member States, have introduced regulatory frameworks providing for LLU. Given the above-mentioned problems, regulators face the challenging task of regulating a market that is changing very rapidly, without stifling any type of innovation, and without improperly disadvantaging any competitor.

Broadband Deal

Broadband-is-cheap provides you with the most up to date information on the latest deals in the UK broadband market.






Print this article    Tell a friend
Related Articles

Post New Comment

This site does not allow anonymous comments. Registered members can login to participate. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds